To my last post.
Somebody sent me a response saying: "Did u write this?! It's beautiful. Except the whole thing about God." They then went on to "clarify" by agreeing with me on the topic of learning via experience rather than simply relying on second hand recounts, which I feel most people would concur with. However, I got the feeling that the real message still was not quite being understood.
So, I responded: "It's all about God... and nominalism and mind forged manacles of society and institution restricting perception. I absolutely agree that you learn more from experience than from a second hand recount in a book that is why I don't believe that you can rely on one entity, one god, one bible to dictate how you perceive these experiences. I feel like "God" consists of the the responses of every single living entity not just one omnipotent being, and definitely not just human beings. You learn more about good versus evil, etcetera etcetera, from personally understanding the natural intuitive interactions among things than you do when your simply told that something is right. Pages in a book aren't evolving or growing the words of dead men are barren. You can learn a lot of really important useful information from those sorts of resources, but the wisdom of man is limited whereas the wisdom of nature is in the entire make up of the universe. The light of man can be disputed and extinguished. The light of organic learning has no limitation because the world is constantly evolving, one can not argue with its function."
No comments:
Post a Comment